🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Benefit advisers. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. HMO. PPO. EPO. POS. HDHP. HSA. Flexible Spending Account. HRA. EOB. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Insurance subsidies.

Confused? It's understandable. Who understands this complex system? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Neither the average employee. Choosing the appropriate medical coverage for companies – or for our families – appears to require demands a PhD in medical insurance.

Our Medical System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Costly

According to recent research, typical households spends $27,000 each year on medical coverage (increasing by 6% compared to last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Now federal operations is shut down due to partisan disputes regarding subsidies which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for millions of Americans.

When Will We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer because this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating for our current Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure remains intact. How our healthcare providers receive payment would change. Believe me, they'll adapt.

How National Health Insurance Would Work

A national health insurance program would need contributions from both workers and companies. In comparable systems, a worker making moderate income pays approximately five point three percent toward medical coverage. Their employer must contribute about thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this seem expensive? Not if you contrast that with what average US resident spends. I can name multiple businesses who are easily contributing between eight to fifteen percent of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. And keep in mind that in comprehensive systems, those payments also cover retirement benefits, illness coverage, maternity leave and unemployment benefits in addition to funding medical services. When you add those costs compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, unemployment insurance and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Execution in the US

For America, universal healthcare funding would raise our Medicare tax deduction, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be income-adjusted – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and company payments. Similar to much of our government's defense, technology, welfare services and transportation services, the program should be outsourced to third-party administrators rather than federal agencies.

Benefits for Entrepreneurs

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford superior coverage. It would render management significantly simpler (a payroll deduction remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, instead of individual transactions to insurance companies and insurance providers).

It would make simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, rather than going through the complicated (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with major insurers required annually every year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension of coverage by our employees – as opposed to existing arrangements which require them to decipher the complexities of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for companies since we wouldn't have access to our employees' medical records for purposes of weighing risks and different options.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that public institutions play important functions in society, from providing defense to funding essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage for everyone via universal healthcare strengthens economic foundations. It represents superior, easier system for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of American employees and generate half of our GDP. It enables employees to be healthier, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Are there a million considerations I haven't covered? Certainly. Given all the healthcare cost increases experienced recently, it's evident that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning very well. I understand that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where big changes are easier to implement. However extending Medicare for all, even with increased taxation required, would remain a better and more affordable strategy both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Time for Realistic Evaluation

We as Americans, must tone down national pride. America's medical care isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind many other countries with the best healthcare globally, based on comprehensive research. Maybe one positive aspect amid present circumstances could be that we undertake serious examination in the mirror and agree that big changes need to happen.